Ewan West KC

Call: 2006 | 2019 (Ireland) | 2024 (DIFC) | Silk: 2024

Custom PDF Contact

Contact Ewan West KC

"*" indicates required fields

Name*
Drop files here or
Accepted file types: doc, docx, pdf, png, jpg, jpeg, Max. file size: 5 MB, Max. files: 8.
    This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

    Education

    MA DPhil (Oxon) MBA (Cranfield) LLB (London)

    Custom PDF

    Which sections would you like to include in your PDF download?

    Introduction

    “The best procurement junior at the Bar. Easy to work with, hes responsive and tuned in to key client concerns.” Chambers UK, 2023

    ‘‘Ewan has textbook knowledge of procurement law. He is strategically astute and great with clients.’’ Legal 500, 2023

    “Offers a beautiful combination of experience and intellect, and has an excellent grasp of the full depth and breadth of the law.” “He’s dedicated and immensely thorough, displaying a natural flair for procurement law and an unbending commitment to delivering the top-quality service clients expect.” – Chambers UK, 2021

    A “top choice of junior” commended for his “regular instruction on the biggest procurement cases”. He provides “very good legal analysis” and is “a pleasure to work with”. –
    Who’s Who Legal UK Bar 2020

    “He has got a really good strategic brain and his written work is first class.” “One of the go-to senior juniors for procurement disputes, he is exceptionally responsive, well liked by clients and persuasive in court.” – Chambers UK, 2020

    ‘‘He has a piercing intellect and shines on his feet.’’ – Legal 500, 2017

    ‘‘He knows procurement law better than almost every barrister in this field.’’ – Legal 500, 2016

    Ewan has a wide-ranging and well-established practice spanning all of Chambers’ main areas of activity, including public procurement, competition, commercial, tax and duties, EU law and EU relations law, regulatory law (especially telecommunications and utilities), information rights, administrative and public law and sports law.

    He has one of the most extensive procurement law practices at the Bar for which he has received widespread recognition as a highly effective and user-friendly advocate, acting for both claimants and defendants (and appearing both led and unled).  Ewan has appeared in many of the leading cases of the past few years including the first claim seeking a declaration of ineffectiveness, the first claim under the Concession Contracts Regulations 2016, and numerous claims involving automatic suspensions and other injunctive relief. He has particular experience of dealing with the protection of confidential information and disclosure (including applications for specific disclosure) in the context of procurement disputes.

    As a competition law practitioner, he has appeared in several high profile cases, including in relation to anticompetitive conduct, abuse of a dominant position and in challenges to competition regulatory decisions.  He was instructed on the first fast track claim to be brought before the Competition Appeal Tribunal.  He has a particularly extensive knowledge of the law of state aid and subsidy and its practical application.

    Ewan’s commercial law activities bring together many other elements of his practice, including competition and procurement law.  He has a particular focus on contractual disputes (in particular arising out of long-term arrangements), contractual variations, injunctive relief and protection of confidentiality.

    As a public law practitioner, Ewan’s recent cases include a number of claims arising out of the Government’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as representing the Secretary of State for Transport in a judicial review challenge against Birmingham City Council concerning PFI funding.  One of  the cases arising out of COVID-19 is of very general public law application, being the first to consider the rules applicable to the service of the claim form in judicial review proceedings and the principles governing extensions of time.

    Ewan also has a very active freedom of information practice, including cases which have a commercial aspect, in which he has acted for the Information Commissioner, public authorities and other parties.

    Ewan has a growing education law practice. He has a particular interest in admissions appeals, examination appeals, provision for special educational needs (including SEND appeals) and contractual disputes relating to educational provision.

    Ewan has appeared in the Supreme Court, Court of Appeal, High Court, Competition Appeal Tribunal, the Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber), the First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber), First-tier Tribunal (Information Rights), First-tier Tribunal (Claims Management Regulation) ), First-tier Tribunal (Special Educational Needs and Disability) and before a large number of regulatory bodies including the Football Association Appeal Board, the Football Disciplinary Commission of the Football League, the Disciplinary Committee of the Six Nations Internationals and the Disciplinary Committee of the Greyhound Board of Great Britain.

    Ewan undertakes a wide range of advisory work in all areas of practice.  He particularly relishes the challenge of finding solutions which do not involve recourse to litigation or mitigate its consequences.  He has worked for a number of regulatory authorities and has a sound technical and practical understanding of economic and financial analysis (he holds an MBA from Cranfield University).

    Before coming to the Bar, Ewan was a Senior Civil Servant in the Department for Transport and its predecessors. In his Civil Service career he was involved with a number of high profile projects, including railway privatisation, the London Underground PPP and Crossrail, developing a particular expertise in dealing with matters at the interface of the public and private sector, including regulatory compliance and state aid. As well having dealt with both the development of Government policy and its implementation through both primary and secondary legislation (including working as Private Secretary to a Minster of State), Ewan had extensive hands-on experience of running public procurements and implementing the requirements of the Freedom of Information Act.

    Ewan is authorised to accept instructions on a public access basis. He also acts as an advocacy tutor for Lincoln’s Inn. He is a committee member of the Procurement Lawyers’ Association.

    Ewan was called to the Bar of Ireland in 2019.

    Ewan is a CEDR accredited mediator.

    Ewan speaks German and has a good reading knowledge of several European languages including French and Italian.

    • News
    • Recent / major cases

      Cases

      Competition

      • R (on the application of British Gas Trading Limited) v Secretary of State for Energy and Net Zero [2023] EWHC 737 (Admin)
      • Westpoint Group v XL Farmcare [2016]
      • NCQR Limited v Institute for Occupational Safety and Health [2016]
      • Humber Oil Terminals Trustee Ltd v Associated British Ports (Ch) [2012] EWCA Civ 36
      • British Telecommunications plc v Office of Communications [2010] CAT 17
      • Stagecoach Group plc v Competition Commission [2010] CAT 14
      • BAA Limited v Competition Commission [2009] CAT 35
      • Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc v Competition Commission (Interim Relief) [2009] CAT 33
      • Tesco plc v Competition Commission [2009] CAT 6
      • Bookmakers Afternoon Greyhound Services & Others v Amalgamated Racing Ltd & Others [2008] EWHC 1978 (Ch)

      Procurement

      • Teleperformance Contact Limited v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] EWHC 2481 (TCC)
      • Siemens Mobility Limited v HS2 (High Speed Two) Ltd [2023] EWHC 2768 (TCC)
      • International Game Technology plc (and others) v Gambling Commission [2023] EWHC 1961 (TCC)
      • R (on the application of the Good Law Project) v Minister for the Cabinet Office [2022] EWCA Civ 21
      • Atos Services UK Ltd v (1) Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (2) Meteorological Office [2022] EWHC 42 (TCC); [2022] EWHC 42 (TCC) [2022] EWHC 78 (TCC)
      • R (on the application of the Good Law Project) v Secretary of State for Health and Social Care v Abingdon Health plc [2022] EWHC 2468
      • Bop Me Limited v Secretary of State for Health and Social Care [2021] EWHC 1817 (TCC)
      • Vodafone Limited v Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs [2021] EWHC 2793 (TCC)
      • R (on the application of the Good Law Project and others) v Secretary of State for Health and Social Care [2021] EWHC 346 (Admin)
      • R (on the application of (1) Good Law Project and (2) EveryDoctor Ltd v Secretary of State for Health and Social Care v Crisp Websites Limited (t/a Pestfix), Clandeboye Agencies, Ayanda Capital Limited [2020] EWHC3609 (TCC); [2021] 1237 EWHC; [2022] EWHC 46 (TCC)
      • Live Music (Nation) UK Ltd v (1) Secretary of State for Ditigal, Media and Sport (2) The Royal Parks (3) TRP Trading Limited [2020] EWHC 1425 (TCC)
      • Mitie Technical Facilities Management Limited v Secretary of State for Justice [2020] EWHC 63 (TCC)
      • Stagecoach East Midlands Trains Ltd & Ors v Department for Transport (Rail Franchising Litigation) [2020] EWHC 1568 (TCC)
      • AEW Europe Ltd v Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council [2019] 2050 EWHC
      • The Queen (on the application of Kenson Contractors (Benington) Limited) v London Borough of Haringey [2019] EWHC 1230 (Admin)
      • Channel Tunnel Group Limited v Secretary of State for Transport [2019] EWHC 419 (TCC)
      • Alstom Transport v London Underground Limited [2018] EWHC 2926 (TCC)
      • DHL Supply Chain Limited v Secretary of State for Health and Social Care [2018] EWHC 2213 (TCC)
      • Ocean Outdoor UK Limited v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC [2018] EWHC 2508 (TCC) [2019] EWCA Civ 1642
      • Construcciones y Auxiliar de Ferrocarriles, S.A. (CAF) v High Speed Two (HS2) Limited [2018] 311 EWHC (TCC)
      • CEMEX UK Operations Limited v Network Rail Infrastructure Limited [2017] EWHC 2392 (TCC)
      • Energy Solutions EU Ltd v Nuclear Decommissioning Authority [2016] EWHC 1988 (TCC), [2016] EWHC 3326 (TCC), [2017] UKSC 34
      • Edenred (UK Group) Ltd v HM Treasury [2015] UKSC 45
      • Group M UK Ltd v Cabinet Office [2014] EWHC 3659 [2014]
      • Blue Water Recoveries Limited v Secretary of State for Transport [2014] EWHC 2970 (QB)
      • Pearson Driving Assessments Ltd v Minister for the Cabinet Office [2013] EWHC 2082 (TCC)
      • Alstom Transport v Eurostar International Limited [2010] EWHC 2747 (Ch) [2011] EWHC 1828 (Ch) [2012] EWHC 28 (Ch)

      Public & Administrative Law

      • R (on the application of AB and CD) v (1) Secretary of State for Health and Social Care and (2) Joint Committee for Vaccination and Immunisation [2022] EWHC 1996 (Admin)
      • R (on the application of the Good Law Project) v Secretary of State for Health and Social Care v Pharmaceuticals Direct Limited [2022] EWCA Civ 355
      • R (on the application of the Good Law Project and others) v Secretary of State for Health and Social Care [2021] EWHC 346 (Admin)
      • Hall and Hanley v Hall & Hanley v Financial Conduct Authority [2019] UKFTT CMS-2019-0001 (GRC)
      • Media Match Limited v Claims Management Regulator [2018] UKFTT CMS- 2018-0010 (GRC)
      • UKMS Money Solutions Limited v Claims Management Regulator [2017] UKFTT CMS-2017-0002 (GRC)
      • The Queen (on the application of Kenson Contractors (Benington) Limited) v London Borough of Haringey [2019] EWHC 1230 (Admin)
      • Vijal Shah v Claims Management Regulator (CMS/2018/0005)
      • Vrang v HMRC [2017] EWHC 1055 (Admin)
      • R (on the application of Sustainable Development Capital) v Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy [2017] EWHC 771 (Admin)
      • R (on the application of Walford) v Worcestershire County Council [2014] EWHC 234 (Admin)
      • R (on the application of Neath Port Talbot Borough Council) v Secretary of State for Health [2013] EWHC 3341 (Admin)

      Information Law

      • Perrys Motor Sales v Information Commissioner (EA/2023/0282)
      • Department for Work and Pensions v Information Commissioner (EA/2023/0328)
      • Cabinet Office v Information Commissioner (EA/2020/0104)
      • Keith Gordon v Information Commissioner (EA/2019/0047)
      • Gloucestershire County Council v Information Commissioner [2017] UKFTT 2016_0125
      • Department for Education v Information Commissioner (EA/2014/0079)
      • Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs v Information Commissioner (EA/2012/0105)
      • Robert Makin v Information Commissioner (Case No. EA/2010/0080 & 81)
      • Department of Work and Pensions v Information Commissioner (Case No. EA/2010/0073)

      VAT, Duties and Indirect Taxation

      • W Resources plc v HMRC [2018] UKFTT 0746 (TC) – economic activity and VAT registration
      • Taylor Wimpey v HMRC [2018] UKUT  55 – application of “builders’ block”
      • Tesco Freetime Limited v HMRC 2017 WL 03433422
      • Mucho Mas Ltd v HMRC [2016] UKFTT 302 (TC) – zero rating for food
      • Maltavini Ltd v HMRC [2016] EKFTT 267 (TC) – reinstatement application
      • Chung (t/a Lake Avenue Fish Bar) v HMRC [2016] UKFTT 215 (TC) – zero rating
      • Bagel Nash v HMRC [2015] EKFTT 72 (TC) – place of consumption for food
      • Hearn and another (t/a Hennerton Golf Club) v HMRC [2014] UKFTT 1115 (TC) – abuse of rights/sports exemption
      • Sub One (t/a Subway) v HMRC [2014] EWCA Civ 773 – VAT treatment of hot takeaway food
      • Oasis (UK) Limited v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs [2010] UKFTT 292 (TC)
    • Competition / state aid

      Ewan has a broad-based competition practice advising on matters such as restrictive agreements, distribution and supply arrangements, refusal to supply and potential Chapter II infringements.  His former Government experience (including dealings with the European Commission) is particularly valued in relation to state aid and subsidy matters.  As the holder of an MBA, he has an informed understanding of corporate finance, accountancy and economic issues.

      Recent and ongoing work includes advice on the new UK subsidy regime; advising on a telecommunications price control determination; the first fast track case to the Competition Appeal Tribunal; advising on the application of competition law to a number of land agreements; and state aid and subsidy advice (including submissions to the UK Government and European Commission) in relation to a number of areas of economic activity including transport, urban development and assistance for unemployed workers.

      Cases

      Recent cases include:

      • R (on the application of British Gas Trading Limited) v Secretary of State for Energy and Net Zero [2023] EWHC 737 (Admin) – application of subsidy control principles in the EU-UK Trade and Co-operation Agreement
      • Westpoint Group v XL Farmcare [2016] – alleged Chapter I and Chapter II infringements
      • NCRQ Limited v Institution of Safety and Health (2016) – first fast track damages claim before the Competition Appeal Tribunal
      • Humber Oil Terminals Trustee v Associated British Ports [2011] EWCH 352(Ch);  [2012] EWCA Civ 36- strike out of competition claim in Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 proceedings
      • Tesco Plc v Competition Commission [2009] CAT 6 – junior counsel for Competition Commission in Tesco’s appeal to CAT challenging proposed “competition test” remedy following Groceries Market Inquiry
      • Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc v Competition Commission (Interim Relief) [2009] CAT 33 – acted unled in defeating an application for interim relief relating to a divestiture remedy imposed by the Competition Commission
      • BAA Limited v Competition Commission [2009] CAT 35 – junior counsel for Competition Commission in BAA’s appeal to CAT following market inquiry into supply of airport services by BAA
      • Bookmakers Afternoon Greyhound Services & Others v Amalgamated Racing Ltd & Others [2008] EWHC 1978 (Ch) – junior counsel for Amalgamated Racing Ltd in challenge under Article 81/Chapter I to lawfulness of licensing arrangements for a new televised picture/data service to bookmakers
      • Liquid Petroleum Gas Market Inquiry – assisting the Competition Commission in implementation of proposed remedies following its market investigation
      • Tesco/Co-op Store Acquisition in Slough – assisting the Competition Commission in implementation of proposed remedies
      • Groceries Market Inquiry – seconded to Competition Commission to assist with preparation of Provisional Findings and Final Report, as well as implementation of remedies, including in relation to controlled land
    • Public procurement

      Ewan is one of the most active specialists in procurement law and has appeared in many of the leading cases, including the first claim for a declaration of ineffectiveness and the first claim under the Concession Contracts Regulations 2016.

      In addition to advising on the initial procurement process, Ewan is increasingly instructed to advise on the operation of public contracts, particularly where potential variations are concerned and the need to achieve a commercial solution has to be balanced against the procurement law risk.  A growing part of this work involves representation for adjudications and mediations.

      Given his prior experience before coming to the Bar, Ewan has a natural affinity with procurement law, especially where it relates to the commissioning of major projects.  His practical experience of managing large procurements is particularly valuable when it is necessary to consider ways to protect procurements, whether future or in progress, against the risk of successful legal challenge or alternatively to identify vulnerabilities and flaws.  By their nature, many of the cases with which Ewan is involved settle or are discontinued before reaching trial and thus do not necessarily enter the public arena.

      He particularly enjoys working as part of a team with solicitors and lay clients (whether on the claimant or defendant side) in constructing practical and commercial solutions that avoid the cost and risk of litigation, or alternatively use procurement law claims as means of gaining leverage in commercial and other disputes.

      His private sector clients have been drawn from a wide variety of sectors, including construction, pharmaceuticals, health, waste, defence, nuclear industry, transportation (including railways and railway rolling stock), IT services, property development, medical products and services and facilities management, while his public sector clients range from large central Government departments down to the smallest local authorities and NHS bodies.

      Ewan has been instructed in relation to a number of claims arising out of urgent procurements dealing with the consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic, including for the supply of Personal Protective Equipment. He also acted for the Met Office in relation to a challenge to its award of a contract for a new supercomputer. Most recently, among other matters he has appeared in one of the few cases where an application to lift the automatic suspension was successfully resisted and is currently instructed on high profile challenges to the award of contracts for the supply of prison operator services and visa and citizenship applications services.

      Cases

      Recent cases include:

      • Teleperformance Contact Limited v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] EWHC 2481 (TCC)
      • Siemens Mobility Limited v HS2 (High Speed Two) Ltd [2022] EWHC 2451 (TCC) [2023] EWHC 2768 (TCC)
      • International Game Technology plc (and others) v Gambling Commission [2022] EWHC 1664 (TCC) – lifting of automatic suspension – and [2023] EWHC 1961 (TCC) – standing of subcontractors under the public procurement regime
      • Atos Services UK Ltd v (1) Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (2) Meteorological Office [2022] EWHC 42 (TCC); [2022] EWHC 42 (TCC) – admission of expert evidence in procurement claim; [2022] EWHC 787 (TCC) – consolidation of claims
      • R (on the application of the Good Law Project) v Minister for the Cabinet Office [2022] EWCA Civ 21 -acted for defendant in successfully resisting challenge to award of contract for focus group services (including claim of apparent bias)
      • R (on the application of the Good Law Project) v Secretary of State for Health and Social Care v Abingdon Health plc [2022] EWHC 2468 – acted for defendant in successful defence of procurement of testing equipment during COVID-19 pandemic
      • Bop Me Limited v Secretary of State for Health and Social Care [2021] EWHC 1817 (TCC) – admission of expert evidence in procurement claim
      • R (on the application of the Good Law Project) v Secretary of State for Health and Social Care v Abingdon Health plc [2021] EWHC 2595 (TCC) – admission of expert evidence in procurement claim
      • Vodafone Limited v Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs [2021] EWHC 2793 (TCC) – acted for claimant in successfully resisting lifting of automatic suspension
      • R (on the application of the Good Law Project and others) v Secretary of State for Health and Social Care [2021] EWHC 346 (Admin) – acted for defendant in challenge concerning publication of contract award notices in relation to urgent procurements carried out during COVID-19 pandemic.
      • R (on the application of (1) Good Law Project and (2) EveryDoctor Ltd v Secretary of State for Health and Social Care v Crisp Websites Limited (t/a Pestfix), Clandeboye Agencies, Ayanda Capital Limited [2020] EWHC3609 (TCC); [2021] 1237 EWHC; [2022] EWHC 46 (TCC) – acted for defendant in successfully resisting challenge to urgent procurements of PPE during COVID-19 pandemic.
      • Live Music (Nation) UK Ltd v (1) Secretary of State for Ditigal, Media and Sport (2) The Royal Parks (3) TRP Trading Limited [2020] EWHC 1425 (TCC) – acted for defendant in challenge to arrangements for Hyde Park Music Festival.
      • Mitie Technical Facilities Management Limited v Secretary of State for Justice [2020] EWHC 63 (TCC) – acted for defendant in challenge to contract for HM Courts and Tribunals Service facilities management (lifting of automatic suspension).
      • Stagecoach East Midlands Trains Ltd & Ors v Department for Transport (Rail Franchising Litigation) [2020] EWHC 1568 (TCC)
      • AEW Europe Ltd v Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council [2019] 2050 EWHC
      • The Queen (on the application of Kenson Contractors (Benington) Limited) v London Borough of Haringey [2019] EWHC 1230 (Admin) – judicial review challenge to award of a below threshold contract.
      • Channel Tunnel Group Limited v Secretary of State for Transport [2019] EWHC 419 (TCC) – challenge to award of contracts for ferry capacity to deal with potential consequences of Brexit.
      • Alstom Transport v London Underground Limited [2018] EWHC 2926 (TCC) – defending application to lifting of automatic suspension.
      • DHL Supply Chain Limited v Secretary of State for Health and Social Care [2018] EWHC 2213 (TCC) – successful application to lift automatic suspension and defence of summary judgment application by claimant.
      • Ocean Outdoor UK Limited v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC [2018] EWHC 2508 (TCC) [2019] EWCA 1642 (Civ) – challenge to arrangements for exploitation of advertising towers over A4.
      • Construcciones y Auxiliar de Ferrocarriles, S.A. (CAF) v High Speed Two (HS2) Limited [2018] EWHC 311(TCC) – acting for claimant in challenge at prequalification stage to procurement of high speed railway rolling stock.
      • CEMEX UK Operations Limited v Network Rail Infrastructure Limited [2017] EWHC 2392 (TCC) – acting for claimant in disclosure application
      • Energy Solutions EU Ltd v Nucjear Decommissioning Authority [2016] EWHC 1988 (TCC), [2016] EWHC 3326 (TCC), [2017] UKSC 34 – acted for claimant in successful challenge to award of long-term contract for decommissioning of Magnox nuclear power stations.
      • Edenred (UK Group) Ltd v HM Treasury [2015] UKSC 45 – acted for defendant in unsuccessful challenge to proposals for delivery of tax-free childcare.
      • Group M UK Ltd v Cabinet Office [2014] EWHC 3659 [2014] – application for specific disclosure/application to lift suspensory effect
      • Blue Water Recoveries Limited v Secretary of State for Transport [2014] EWHC 2970 (QB) – application for preliminary issue on limitation.
      • Pearson Driving Assessments Ltd v Minister for the Cabinet Office [2013] EWHC 2082 (TCC) – application for specific disclosure
      • Darlington College v Secretary of State for Defence  – successful application to lift suspensory effect.
      • Alstom Transport v Eurostar International Limited [2012] EWHC 28 (Ch)  –  preliminary issue as to status of Eurostar under Utilities Contracts Regulations 2006.
      • Matrix SCM v London Borough of Newham [2011] EWHC 2414 (Ch) – acted for successful defendant in strike out application (limitation).
      • Alstom Transport v Eurostar International Limited  [2011] EWHC 1828 (Ch) – acted for defendant in unsuccessful application for a declaration of ineffectiveness.
      • Alstom Transport v Eurostar International Limited [2010] EWHC 2747 (Ch) – acted for defendant in unsuccessful interim injunction application.
      • Community Care North East (a partnership) v Durham County Council [2010] EWHC 959 (QB) [2012] 1 W.L.R. 338 – implications of termination of a procurement and operation of a Tomlin order.
      • Croft House Care and others v Durham County Council [2010] EWHC 909 (TCC) – treatment of confidential information for purposes of a procurement challenge.
      • Lion Apparel Systems Ltd v Firebuy Ltd – damages action for breach of procurement regime.
    • Commercial dispute resolution

      Ewan’s practice encompasses substantial areas of commercial dispute resolution, often arising alongside issues of procurement and competition law. Much of his work in these areas has at its heart the need to protect commercial interests and secure tangible commercial benefits, including during contract performance. He has considerable experience in particular of contractual disputes and their resolution, especially where one of the counterparties is a Government department or other public body. He also has experience in dealing with issues of commercial governance, risk management and contract management. He is very familiar with the structuring and financing of complex infrastructure transactions, including PPP/PFI and similar long-term arrangements.

      As the holder of an MBA, Ewan possesses the necessary technical toolkit to deal with the most complex financial cases. He has experience of working across numerous sectors including construction, pharmaceuticals, waste, transportation, IT and facilities management. He has substantial courtroom experience (both led and unled) with particular emphasis on matters of injunctive relief, amendments, disclosure and confidentiality, as well as experience of commercial judicial review. He also has experience of adjudications.

      Ewan is a CEDR-accredited mediator and has participated in numerous mediations where the fundamental aim has been to realise tangible commercial (as well as reputational and relationship) benefits for his clients.

      He has experience of financial services regulation and has appeared on behalf of both the Claims Management Regulator and the Financial Conduct Authority.

      Ewan is regularly ranked in Who’s Who Legal: Government Contracts.

      Cases

      Current/ recent cases:

      • Defence of a claim for commission and consultancy charges (which settled shortly before trial).
      • Advising on implications of technological change for operation of long-term agreement
      • Advising in relation to termination of a long-term supply arrangement and notice provisions
      • Advising in relation to the contractual interpretation of a major agreement for delivery of training and development services
      • Advising on the operation of commercial arrangements for delivery of veterinary and associated services
      • Advising on the operation of an accreditation service for the provision of professional services
      • Advising on a contractual dispute concerning the operation of a framework agreement for home delivery of pharmaceutical products
      • Hall & Hanley v Financial Conduct Authority [2019] UKFTT CMS-2019-0001 (GRC)
      • Vijal Shah v Claims Management Regulator [2019] UKFTT CMS-2018-0005 (GRC)
      • Media Match Limited v Claims Management Regulator [2018] UKFTT CMS-2018-0010 (GRC)
      • UKMS Money Solutions Limited v Claims Management Regulator [2017] UKFTT CMS-2017-0002 (GRC)
      • The Queen (on the application of Kenson Contractors (Benington) Limited) v London Borough of Haringey [2019] EWHC 1230 (Admin) – judicial review challenge to award of a below threshold contract
      • R (on the application of Sustainable Development Capital) v Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy [2017] EWHC 771 (Admin) – acted for the interested party (the successful bidder) in an unsuccessful judicial review of the Government’s disposal of the Green Investment Bank
    • Administrative & public

      Ewan advises across the field of public and administrative law. His former experience as a Senior Civil Servant is particularly valuable in this regard given his intimate acquaintance with the process of public sector decision-making and the practical constraints that bear upon public authorities.

      As a civil servant, Ewan was also intimately involved in the development of legislation, working at all stages of the process from broad policy initiatives (formulated at Ministerial level) through to the enactment of specific measures, whether by means of primary or secondary legislation. He has experience of preparing briefing for and attending Parliamentary debates on legislation. In his career at the Bar he has also been involved in drafting secondary legislation. Ewan is also regularly instructed by the Claims Management Regulator (now the Financial Conduct Authority) in appeals under the Compensation Act 2006.

      More recently, he has been involved in defending a number of claims arising out of the Government’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic, including in relation to the vaccination programme, restrictions on public behaviour and provision of information concerning shielding. In a challenge to the offer of vaccination to those aged 16 and 17 he successfully resisted an application for interim relief before the Court of Appeal in a claim for which permission was ultimately refused after two substantive hearings before the High Court. He is currently instructed in a challenge to PFI highways funding acting on behalf of the Secretary of State for Transport.

      One of the claims brought by way of judicial review against the procurement of PPE during the COVID-19 pandemic was the first to require consideration of the rules applicable to the service of the claim form in judicial review proceedings and the principles governing extensions of time. This claim is of very general application to judicial review practitioners and has been widely reported.

      Cases

      Current / Recent Cases:

      • R (on the application of British Gas Trading Limited) v Secretary of State for Energy and Net Zero [2023] EWHC 737 (Admin) – application of subsidy control principles in the EU-UK Trade and Co-operation Agreement
      • R (on the application of AB and CD) v (1) Secretary of State for Health and Social Care and (2) Joint Committee for Vaccination and Immunisation [2022] EWHC 1996 (Admin)
      • R (on the application of the Good Law Project) v Secretary of State for Health and Social Care v Pharmaceuticals Direct Limited [2022] EWCA Civ 355
      • R (on the application of the Good Law Project and others) v Secretary of State for Health and Social Care [2021] EWHC 346 (Admin)
      • Orion Corporation v Secretary of State for Health and Social Care acting as the Licensing Authority v Ever Neuro Pharma GmBH [2019] EWHC 689 (Admin)
      • Cabinet Office v Information Commissioner (EA/2020/0104)
      • Hall and Hanley v Hall & Hanley v Financial Conduct Authority [2019] UKFTT CMS-2019-0001 (GRC)
      • Media Match Limited v Claims Management Regulator [2018] UKFTT CMS- 2018-0010 (GRC)
      • UKMS Money Solutions Limited v Claims Management Regulator [2017] UKFTT CMS-2017-0002 (GRC)
      • The Queen (on the application of Kenson Contractors (Benington) Limited) v London Borough of Haringey [2019] EWHC 1230 (Admin)
      • Vijal Shah v Claims Management Regulator (CMS/2018/0005) – cancellation of authorisation
      • Vrang v HMRC [2017] EWHC 1055 (Admin)
      • R (on the application of Sustainable Development Capital) v Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy [2017] EWHC 771 (Admin)
      • R (on the application of Walford) v Worcestershire County Council [2014] EWHC 234 (Admin)
      • R (on the application of Neath Port Talbot Borough Council) v Secretary of State for Health [2013] EWHC 3341 (Admin)
    • Education

      Before coming to the Bar, Ewan worked for nearly ten years in higher education, both as a lecturer/tutor/researcher (in music history and theory, not law) and in educational administration (including as secretary to a professional organization), as well as acting as an examiner (for both written and practical examinations). He also brings to his practice a close continuing personal involvement in education having acted as a school governor (of two state schools) and as trustee of an educational foundation.

      Ewan accepts instructions across the full range of education law issues. He has a particular interest and expertise in admissions appeals, examination appeals, provision for special educational needs and disability and contractual disputes relating to educational provision.  He has appeared before the First-tier Tribunal (Special Educational Needs and Disability).  He is always concerned to explore opportunities for informal settlement and negotiation, which can be quicker and more effective than proceeding through a formal process or litigating.

      In other areas of his practice Ewan has also advised and acted for a wide range of education bodies, including the Department for Education, the Standards and Testing Agency, universities, schools and awarding bodies, including in relation to public procurement, commercial law and freedom of information. Most recently he has acted in relation to a challenge arising out of arrangements for teaching training and in a challenge to remote examination arrangements.

    • EU and EU relations law

      Much of Ewan’s practice has historically had an EU law basis, in particular public procurement, competition and regulatory law.  He has therefore often been called upon to advise on the interpretation of EU law and its interaction with domestic law, including in particular in relation to free movement and single market provisions.

      In the light of the UK’s withdrawal from the EU, the focus is now shifting to the emerging field of EU relations law, i.e. the law governing the new relationship between the EU and UK post Brexit.  As well as involving consideration of retained EU law, this includes the interpretation and application of the legal agreements concluded between the UK and EU, most notably the Trade and Co-operation Agreement and the Northern Ireland Protocol.  It also requires taking account of new domestic law, including the Internal Market Act 2020 and the Trade Act 2021.

      Recent work includes advising on matters of subsidy in relation to the Trade and Co-operation Agreement and Northern Ireland Protocol.

      Cases

      • R (on the application of British Gas Trading Limited) v Secretary of State for Energy and Net Zero [2023] EWHC 737 (Admin) – application of subsidy control principles in the EU-UK Trade and Co-operation Agreement
      • Orion Corporation v Secretary of State for Health and Social Care acting as the Licensing Authority v Ever Neuro Pharma GmBH [2019] EWHC 689 (Admin) – validity of Czech pharmaceutical marketing authorization granted pre-accession
      • Energy Solutions EU Ltd v Nuclear Decommissioning Authority [2017] UKSC 34 – case establishing requirement to meet Francovich conditions for award of damages for breach of procurement law obligations
      • Vrang v HMRC [2017] EWHC 1055 (Admin) – challenge to EU/Swiss tax treaty
    • Information law

      As a Civil Servant Ewan was involved with the practical implementation of compliance with the Freedom of Information Act 2000 prior to coming to the Bar.  He now regularly appears before the General Regulatory Chamber (Information Rights) and much of his other litigation involves matters of information and data protection law.   He is particularly experienced in dealing with the interface between those obligations and the protection of commercially confidential information, for example not least in public procurement and competition litigation. As a former Senior Civil Servant, he is well attuned to the context within which much information that is the subject of requests has been generated and the issues that arise.

      Cases

      • Perrys Motor Sales v Information Commissioner (EA/2023/0282)
      • Department for Work and Pensions v Information Commissioner (EA/2023/0328)
      • Cabinet Office v Information Commissioner (EA/2020/0104)
      • Keith Gordon v Information Commissioner (EA/2019/0047).
      • Department for Education v Information Commissioner and Whitmey [2018] UKUT 348 (AAC)
      • Gloucestershire County Council v Information Commissioner [2017] UKFTT 2016_0125
      • Department for Education v Information Commissioner (EA/2014/0079)
      • Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs v Information Commissioner (EA/2012/0105)
      • Robert Makin v Information Commissioner (Case No. EA/2010/0080 & 81)
      • Department of Work and Pensions v Information Commissioner (EA/2010/0073) Alan Fisher v Information Commissioner (Case No. EA/2010/0044)
      • Chief Constable of Surrey Police v Information Commissioner (Case No. EA/2009/0081)
      • Ceri Gibbons v Information Commissioner (Case No. EA/2009/002)
    • VAT & customs

      Ewan has experience of a wide range of VAT matters, including single/multiple supply, place of supply, exempt and zero-rated supply and MTIC fraud. He also has some experience in Insurance Premium Tax.

      He has been instructed by both the taxpayer and HMRC in proceedings before the First Tier Tribunal and Upper Tribunal and has appeared in the Court of Appeal on VAT matters. Recent advisory work has included consideration of the partial exemptions regime, single/multiple supply and the VAT treatment of property transactions.

      Cases

      Recent / Current Cases:

      • W Resources plc v HMRC [2018] UKFTT 0746 (TC) – economic activity and VAT registration
      • Taylor Wimpey v HMRC [2018] UKUT  55 – application of “builders’ block”
      • Tesco Freetime Limited v HMRC 2017 WL 03433422
      • Mucho Mas Ltd v HMRC [2016] UKFTT 302 (TC) – zero rating for food
      • Maltavini Ltd v HMRC [2016] EKFTT 267 (TC) – reinstatement application
      • Chung (t/a Lake Avenue Fish Bar) v HMRC [2016] UKFTT 215 (TC) – zero rating for takeway food
      • Bagel Nash v HMRC [2015] EKFTT 72 (TC) – place of consumption for food
      • Hearn and another (t/a Hennerton Golf Club) v HMRC [2014] UKFTT 1115 (TC) – abuse of rights/sports exemption
      • Sub One (t/a Subway) v HMRC [2014] EWCA Civ 773 – VAT treatment of hot takeaway food
      • Foster v HMRC [2014] UKFTT 900 (TC) – restoration appeal
      • Logistical Transportation Limited v HMRC [2013] UKFTT 167 (TC) – restoration appeal
      • Battle Club v HMRC [2013] UKFTT 302 (TC) – amusement machine licence duty
      • Matthew Davies t/a Special Occasions/2XL Limos v HMRC [2012] UKUT 130 (TC) – VAT on stretch limousines
      • Oasis (UK) Limited v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs [2010] UKFTT 292 (TC) – categorisation of machine under s.23 VATA 1994 and application of lottery exemption
      • ERF Limited v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs [2012] UKUT 105 (TCC)
      • RM Education v HMRC [2009] STI 451 – exemption under Schedule 6 Schedule 9 VATA 1994
    • What the directories say

      Public Procurement: “Ewan is very likeable and friendly. He has good drafting skills and is technically very able.” “He has really top knowledge, experience and judgement. He is a prodigious worker who never lets things go until they have been checked.” – Chambers UK, 2025

      New Silk in Public procurement: ‘‘Recognised leader in the field of public procurement with encyclopedic knowledge of the law in this area. Provides excellent level of service on procurement challenges often within very tight timescales.’’ – Legal 500, 2025

      New Silk in Administrative Law and Human Rights: ‘‘He is very knowledgeable, good on his feet and respected by judges.’’ – Legal 500, 2025

      Public Procurement: He has a voracious capacity for work and is incredibly thorough and clever.” “He is an incredibly valuable asset to have on your team, as he has an encyclopaedic knowledge of procurement case law and works quickly to tight deadlines. He is also knowledgeable and thorough in his written work.” “Ewan is a very strong procurement counsel with a very wide range of experience to draw on. He frequently goes above and beyond in terms of client service.” – Chambers UK, 2024

      Leading junior in Public procurement: ‘‘He comes up with good strategies for clients.’’ – Legal 500, 2024

      Leading junior in Administrative Law and Human Rights: ‘‘A good team player who is extremely responsive and great with clients.’’ – Legal 500, 2024

      Public Procurement: “The best procurement junior at the Bar. Easy to work with, he’s responsive and tuned in to key client concerns.” – Chambers UK, 2023

      Leading junior in Public procurement: ‘‘Ewan has textbook knowledge of procurement law. He is strategically astute and great with clients.’’ – Legal 500, 2023

      Leading junior in Administrative Law and Human Rights – Legal 500, 2023

      Recommended in Government Contracts, Who’s Who Legal Global Guide 2022

      “Ewan West is held in high regard for his experience advising both claimants and defendants on complex procurement issues.” – Government Contracts, Who’s Who Legal UK Bar 2022

      Public Procurement: “He is very experienced and has a good feel for the regulations and how to apply them. His advocacy is also very effective.” “He is very good technically and on paper.” – Chambers UK, 2022

      Leading junior in Public procurement – Legal 500, 2022

      Recommended in Government Contracts, Who’s Who Legal UK Bar 2021

      Public Procurement: “Offers a beautiful combination of experience and intellect, and has an excellent grasp of the full depth and breadth of the law.” “He’s dedicated and immensely thorough, displaying a natural flair for procurement law and an unbending commitment to delivering the top-quality service clients expect.” – Chambers UK, 2021

      Leading junior in Public procurement: ‘‘Forensic knowledge of procurement law and practice, brings a wealth of experience to the advice that he gives, a QC in waiting.’’ – Legal 500, 2021

      “A “top choice of junior” commended for his “regular instruction on the biggest procurement cases”. He provides “very good legal analysis” and is “a pleasure to work with”. – Government Contracts, Who’s Who Legal UK Bar 2020

      Public Procurement: “He has got a really good strategic brain and his written work is first class.” “One of the go-to senior juniors for procurement disputes, he is exceptionally responsive, well liked by clients and persuasive in court.” – Chambers UK, 2020

      Leading junior in Public procurement: ‘‘He is excellent on contentious procurement matters.’’ – Legal 500, 2020

      Highly experienced government contracts junior who is highlighted as an expert in advising on commercial solutions to procurement issues” – Government Contracts, Who’s Who Legal UK Bar 2019

      Public Procurement: “Helpful and practical, he marries deep knowledge of the procurement sector with an understanding of the client’s commercial goals.”Chambers UK, 2019

      Leading junior in Public procurement: ‘‘He is very experienced in procurement law and his drafting is first rate.’’ – Legal 500, 2018

      Public Procurement: “He is a go-to senior junior for procurement disputes who is exceptionally responsive, well liked by clients and persuasive in court.”Chambers UK, 2018

      Leading junior in Public procurement: ‘‘He has a piercing intellect and shines on his feet.’’ – Legal 500, 2017

      Public Procurement: “Ewan is exceptional and goes beyond the call of duty.” “Having worked within the government, he understands the machinery of it, which is very helpful.”Chambers UK, 2017

      Leading Junior in Public Procurement: ‘‘He knows procurement law better than almost every barrister in this field.’’Legal 500, 2016 

      Government Contracts: regularly acts for tenderers and local authorities on the full range of procurement matters. Sources remark that “he has built a first rate junior practice in procurement law.”WHO’S WHO LEGAL (WWL) UK BAR 2016

      Public Procurement: “Dedicated and immensely thorough, he has a natural flair for procurement law and an unbending commitment to delivering the top-quality service our clients expect.”Chambers UK, 2016

      ”Not afraid to get to grips with the technical detail.” Leading junior in Public Procurement Law. Legal 500, 2015

      Public Procurement: “Ewan is clever, articulate and committed to finding answers to difficult questions.” “He’s responsive, practical and firm in his dealings.”Chambers UK, 2015

      ‘Great insight into how authorities think and work.’ Ewan is recommended as a leading Junior under Public Procurement Law. Legal 500, 2014

      Public Procurement: Clients benefit from his familiarity with central government proceedings. He handles a broad range of procurement instructions and is qualified to undertake direct access work. “He’s very well organised, and has good judgement and a good knowledge of the subject.” Chambers UK, 2014

      Ewan West is ‘extremely approachable and knowledgeable’.” He is recommended as a leading Junior under Public Procurement Law. Legal 500, 2013

      Public Procurement: “Nothing is too much trouble for” Ewan West, say those that instruct him. This former civil servant has “an invaluable understanding of the workings of central government.” Sources find him to be a man who “provides practical and creative solutions.” Chambers UK, 2013

      Ewan West has a wide-ranging procurement practice. Formerly a Senior Civil Servant in the Department for Transport, he understands the workings of the public sector better than most. This additional perspective proved invaluable when he successfully represented Eurostar after Alstom sought an interim injunction preventing it from entering a contract to purchase trains from Siemens. Interviewees note that he is “personable and intelligent; he gets the bigger picture as well as the finer details, and goes beyond the extra mile to get the job done.”Chambers UK, 2012

      Cases

      Recent / Current Cases:

      • W Resources plc v HMRC [2018] UKFTT 0746 (TC) – economic activity and VAT registration
      • Taylor Wimpey v HMRC [2018] UKUT  55 – application of “builders’ block”
      • Tesco Freetime Limited v HMRC 2017 WL 03433422
      • Mucho Mas Ltd v HMRC [2016] UKFTT 302 (TC) – zero rating for food
      • Maltavini Ltd v HMRC [2016] EKFTT 267 (TC) – reinstatement application
      • Chung (t/a Lake Avenue Fish Bar) v HMRC [2016] UKFTT 215 (TC) – zero rating for takeway food
      • Bagel Nash v HMRC [2015] EKFTT 72 (TC) – place of consumption for food
      • Hearn and another (t/a Hennerton Golf Club) v HMRC [2014] UKFTT 1115 (TC) – abuse of rights/sports exemption
      • Sub One (t/a Subway) v HMRC [2014] EWCA Civ 773 – VAT treatment of hot takeaway food
      • Foster v HMRC [2014] UKFTT 900 (TC) – restoration appeal
      • Logistical Transportation Limited v HMRC [2013] UKFTT 167 (TC) – restoration appeal
      • Battle Club v HMRC [2013] UKFTT 302 (TC) – amusement machine licence duty
      • Matthew Davies t/a Special Occasions/2XL Limos v HMRC [2012] UKUT 130 (TC) – VAT on stretch limousines
      • Oasis (UK) Limited v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs [2010] UKFTT 292 (TC) – categorisation of machine under s.23 VATA 1994 and application of lottery exemption
      • ERF Limited v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs [2012] UKUT 105 (TCC)
      • RM Education v HMRC [2009] STI 451 – exemption under Schedule 6 Schedule 9 VATA 1994
    • Education and prizes
      • 1981: Bachelor of Arts ~ Oxford University (First Class)
      • 1985: Master of Arts ~ Oxford University
      • 1992: Doctor of Philosophy ~ Oxford University
      • 1998: Master of Business Administration ~ Cranfield University
      • 2004: Graduate Diploma in Law (Distinction)
      • 2005: Bachelor of Laws – London University (First Class)
      • 2006: Bar Vocational Course (all legal studies part-time)
      • 2019: Barrister at Law (Ireland)

      Called to the Bar 2006 (England and Wales) 2019 (Ireland).

      CEDR accredited mediator.

    • Publications
    Search