Brexit is an unprecedented political, economic and legal phenomenon. The Monckton Brexit Blog gives you expert legal insight and analysis from barristers at Monckton Chambers.
Welcome to the Monckton Brexit Blog
On 23 June 2016, the UK’s voters were asked to give a one word answer to a simple question: “Should the United Kingdom remain a member of the European Union or leave the European Union?”. 52% chose “leave”. However, what comes next is far from simple.
Read the welcome message from Philip Woolfe.
- The government’s new state aid proposals are the worst of all worlds03 Dec 2019 | by George Peretz QCThe European Union state aid rules are a keystone of the EU single market: by setting limits, enforced by the Commission, on the ability to subsidise domestic industries, they make it possible for member states fully to open their markets to each other’s goods and services, confident that their own producers will not face unfairly […]
- Fisheries after Brexit27 Nov 2019 | by Peter OliverTwo years ago, I helped organise and chaired an evening conference at the British Institute of International and Comparative Law on the subject of the legal consequences of Brexit for the fishing industry. Since that conference was rated a great success, BIICL decided to repeat the experience on 19 November at the offices of public […]
- What’s (or what’s not) in the Johnson draft Withdrawal Agreement Bill?25 Oct 2019 | by Anneli HowardPlease click here to see the analysis.
- Anneli Howard analyses and compares the Boris Johnson deal with Theresa May’s deal and the existing deal in the TEU/TFEU18 Oct 2019 | by Monckton ChambersPlease click here to see the analysis.
- Supreme Court: prorogation unlawful25 Sep 2019 | by Steven Gee QCThe case before the Supreme Court will not determine whether the UK should remain in or leave the EU, or the terms on which it should leave. It is not about the competing arguments about Brexit. It is a case about the Constitution of the United Kingdom. Much of it is unwritten, but it exists. […]
- Professor Carl Baudenbacher: EEA on the table again?28 May 2019 | by Carl BaudenbacherPhoto: @EFTAsecretariat One hour after Theresa May’s resignation on 24 May 2019, Former EFTA Court President Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Carl Baudenbacher from Monckton Chambers spoke on Brexit and the EEA at the meeting of the European Economic and Social Committee marking the 25th anniversary of the European Economic Area. Baudenbacher stressed that there was […]
- Legislating the Byzantine way: the Brexit Procurement SIs12 Mar 2019 | by Jack WilliamsTowards the end of last year, the Cabinet Office published a draft statutory instrument, the Public Procurement (Amendment etc.) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019 (“the first SI”), which was then laid before Parliament pursuant to Schedule 7 of the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 (“the Act”). On 11th February 2019, a second SI ((The Public Procurement […]
- Does Wightman mean that Miller was decided incorrectly?10 Dec 2018 | by Jack WilliamsThe Court of Justice of the European Union has today in C-621/18 Wightman held that an Article 50 notice is unilaterally revocable, subject to specified conditions. (For a summary, see here .) It will be recalled that the Supreme Court in Miller  UKSC 5 assumed, on an invitation from the parties, that Article 50 […]
- Wightman AG opinion05 Dec 2018 | by Anneli HowardIn his opinion today, the Advocate General at the CJEU has made clear that Brexit is not a one-way cul-de-sac with no prospect of turning back. Even at the point where the withdrawal agreement has been negotiated, the UK can take stock and reflect during a “cooling off period” that continues for the two year […]
- State Aid and The Withdrawal Agreement: Key Points03 Dec 2018 | by George Peretz QCThe UK Government’s intention to maintain the EU State aid rules has been clear for some time. I briefly discussed the reasons why it has taken that view – and done so without significant opposition – in a piece I wrote here. The intention to hold onto the State aid rules was strong enough for the […]