NEWS
Monckton Chambers' competition expertise sought on all sides in recent landmark CAT decision
4 March 2009
On 4 March, the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) handed down judgment in Tesco's application for review of one of the Competition Commission's (CC) remedies in its Groceries Report.
Following a two-year inquiry into the grocery sector, the CC had recommended to central government that a 'competition test' should be introduced into the planning system. The CAT held that the CC had failed properly to consider certain relevant considerations relating to the costs and benefits of the competition test. The CAT clarified, however, that it had not concluded that the competition test was unreasonable, disproportionate or otherwise inappropriate or unlawful.
The parties have been invited to address the CAT on the question of specific relief at a hearing on 16 March 2009.
Several barristers from Monckton Chambers were involved in the case. Julian Gregory acted for Tesco.
Peter Roth QC, Daniel Beard, Valentina Sloane and Ewan West acted for the Competition Commission.
Tim Ward and Kassie Smith acted for the interveners, Asda and Waitrose respectively.
Please click below for more information on:
Tim Ward QC
Kassie Smith QC
Julian Gregory
7/5/2013 Monckton Chambers receives three nominations for The Lawyer Awards
2/5/2013 Greenpeace and in-shore fishermen in court for fishing quota case
1/5/2013 Supreme Court sends air pollution case to the CJEU
9/5/2013 Cambridge Associates in Management v Ofsted
15/3/2013 High Speed Rail judgment given
7/3/2013 Kassie Smith in Supreme Court for air pollution appeal
14/6/2013 Commercial Judicial Review and Regulatory Proceedings
5/6/2013 Bid Exclusion: Live Issues
22/5/2013 Getting hold of the documents: Legal principles for disclosure in the anti-trust context
All UK VAT Groups can Breathe a Sigh of Relief
Composite Supplies at Separate Rates: Colaingrove Ltd v HMRC
National Grid Electricity Transmission plc v ABB Limited and others

