NEWS
Judicial Review of the Coal Authority Fails
23 May 2007
The Administrative Court has rejected a claim by Abbey Mine to quash a decision of the Coal Authority to grant a licence to Corus, the steel maker, to mine coal in the Margam area of South Wales. The Court had to consider how to apply the public law principle of fairness in the context of a comparative evaluation of competing bids. Among the arguments it rejected was that fairness dictated that the decision maker should disclose a number of documents to Abbey Mine. A competition law attack was also made on the Coal Authority. This also failed. Of particular interest was the Court's rejection of an argument that, because of the royalty payments received from its licensing functions, the Coal Authority was an undertaking for the purposes of competition law.
Christopher Vajda QC and Josh Holmes, instructed by Nabarro, acted for the Coal Authority.
Please click below for more information on:
Josh Holmes
21/5/2013 Monckton hosts successful Financial Services Seminar
7/5/2013 Monckton Chambers receives three nominations for The Lawyer Awards
2/5/2013 Greenpeace and in-shore fishermen in court for fishing quota case
9/5/2013 Cambridge Associates in Management v Ofsted
15/3/2013 High Speed Rail judgment given
7/3/2013 Kassie Smith in Supreme Court for air pollution appeal
14/6/2013 Commercial Judicial Review and Regulatory Proceedings
5/6/2013 Bid Exclusion: Live Issues
22/5/2013 Getting hold of the documents: Legal principles for disclosure in the anti-trust context
All UK VAT Groups can Breathe a Sigh of Relief
Composite Supplies at Separate Rates: Colaingrove Ltd v HMRC
National Grid Electricity Transmission plc v ABB Limited and others

