O'Brien v Ministry of Justice (Council of Immigration Judges intervening)
23 July 2012
[2010] UKSC 34; [2010] 4 All E.R. 62 (SC No 1)
[2012] 2 C.M.L.R. 25 (CJEU)
9 July 2012 (Preliminary Ruling, SC No 2)
The Supreme Court has determined that a part-time judge falls within the scope of the Part-time Workers Directive, moving fee paid part-time judges a significant step closer to obtaining pension rights.
This was the second hearing in the Supreme Court. It followed a reference to the Court of Justice of the European Union.
At the second hearing in the Supreme Court, the Ministry of Justice argued that both the issue of whether a part-time judge was a "worker" and the question of objective justification should be remitted to the Employment Tribunal.
The Supreme Court will give reasons for its determination that Mr O'Brien was a part-time worker at a later date.
On the issue of objective justification, the Court has not directed an immediate remission to the Employment Tribunal. Remission will be appropriate only if there are significant disputed issues of fact to be determined. Directions have been given to the parties which are intended to enable that issue to be resolved and to make progress with the determination of the appeal. The Council of Immigration Judges has been given permission to serve witness statements and a further supplementary written case.
There will be a further hearing of the appeal on 21 November 2012 to determine what (if any) issues should be remitted to the Employment Tribunal and to decide any issues which are not remitted.
Ian Rogers appeared for the Council of Immigration Judges in the Supreme Court and in the Court of Justice of the European Union.
Ian has also drafted claims for a large number of fee paid part-time judges in the Employment Tribunal under the Public Access Scheme. Short time limits apply to such claims.
For a summary of the preliminary ruling, please click here.
As to the first hearing in the Supreme Court, please click here.
As to the hearing in the Court of Justice of the European Union, please click here.
Please click below for more information on:
Ian Rogers
7/5/2013 Monckton Chambers receives three nominations for The Lawyer Awards
2/5/2013 Greenpeace and in-shore fishermen in court for fishing quota case
1/5/2013 Supreme Court sends air pollution case to the CJEU
9/5/2013 Cambridge Associates in Management v Ofsted
15/3/2013 High Speed Rail judgment given
7/3/2013 Kassie Smith in Supreme Court for air pollution appeal
14/6/2013 Commercial Judicial Review and Regulatory Proceedings
5/6/2013 Bid Exclusion: Live Issues
22/5/2013 Getting hold of the documents: Legal principles for disclosure in the anti-trust context
All UK VAT Groups can Breathe a Sigh of Relief
Composite Supplies at Separate Rates: Colaingrove Ltd v HMRC
National Grid Electricity Transmission plc v ABB Limited and others

