Find a Barrister  Search site
Download/Print CV
  • What the Directories Say

 "Appearing in not one but two of The Lawyer's top 20 cases for 2012, and with two Supreme Court cases expected to be heard in the coming months, Monckton Chambers' Christopher Vajda QC is on a roll. [...] Vajda's EU and competition expertise is top notch." - The Lawyer Top 100 2012

Under Administrative & Public Law, "Christopher Vajda QC is another talented competition practitioner with a flair for judicial reviews involving regulators. He is a favourite in Competition Commission investigations, and recently acted in the first ever judicial review challenge of VAT charges on postal services." - Chambers UK, 2012

For Competition/European Law "one of the set's big names ... Christopher Vajda QC, "an outstandingly good community and UK competition lawyer." Impressed clients say of him: "He is a very careful lawyer, who knows a lot of law and is very good at applying it." He led the team on behalf of Ballast Nedam in appealing an OFT decision to fine the company for price fixing in the construction industry." - Chambers UK, 2012

Procurement: "Experienced litigator Christopher Vajda QC, who receives widespread acclaim for being "a calm, thoughtful and diligent leader who approaches things excellently, no matter how difficult a case is." He recently appeared in Juliet Prew v Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families, a case looking at whether the academy schools programme complies with public procurement rules." - Chambers UK, 2012

Tax: "Experienced litigator Christopher Vajda QC, who handles various matters before specialist competition and tax tribunals. His tax practice functions alongside a broad caseload that takes in EU/competition, judicial review and regulatory law. Clients admire the comprehensibility of his advice, whilst his rivals applaud that "he is a very decent opponent who won't pull dirty tricks on you." - Chambers UK, 2012

Telecommunications: "Christopher Vajda QC is "amenable and very clear in his advice." He appeals to clients as he "exudes considerable gravitas in court." Of late he has been leading in a major High Court damages action alleging cartel activity launched by Nokia against a number of manufacturers of liquid crystal displays.  - Chambers UK, 2012

Under Public and Administrative Law Christopher Vajda QC "is recommended for his regulatory expertise and experience before the CAT, High Court and Court of Appeal."  Legal 500, 2011

Christopher Vajda QC is a recommended Leading Silk in EU & Competition Law in Legal 500, 2011

Christopher Vajda QC is a recommended Leading Silk in Meia, Entertainment & Sport in Legal 500, 2011

Tax: Corporate and VAT recommended silks include Christopher Vajda QC "who is 'extremely responsive, gives very sound advice', and 'commands the respect of judges and other barristers'." Legal 500, 2011

Under administrative and public law (including local government law) the Legal 500, 2010 states that 'Christopher Vajda QC is a star in challenges to regulators, while a leading light in procurement law'.

EU and competition declares the 'outstanding silk Christopher Vajda QC has a strong intellect, is very versatile across UK and EU cases, and has the ability to respond to the other side's argument at the drop of a hat'. - Legal 500, 2010

Administrative & Public Law in Chambers UK, 2011 recommends Christopher Vajda QC as an "accomplished competition counsel who regularly appears in high-profile judicial reviews for and against regulators. He is "strong technically and a doughty opponent"."

"If you're looking for "a highly versatile and proactive EU and competition adviser," Christopher Vajda QC fits the bill. A seasoned campaigner, he acted as lead counsel to Ballast Nedam in the construction industry cartel matter." Competition/European Law - Chambers UK, 2011

Under Tax: Indirect, Chambers UK, 2011 recommends "the respected, Christopher Vajda QC who "is very good on the analysis," according to interviewees. He advises on European, competition, public and tax law, often appearing before the House of Lords, the Court of Appeal and the ECJ. Peers praise his "straightforward, clear approach"."

"Christopher Vajda QC has been busy this year with cases in the administrative court, specifically Juliet Prew v Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families, where the court sought to determine whether the Academy Schools programme complies with the public procurement rules. He has also been involved in several notable actions on behalf of local councils. One source commented: "He is a formidable competitor who is a very worthy opponent for anyone"." Public Procurement - Chambers UK, 2011

Click here for full details.

CHRISTOPHER VAJDA QC

QC MA (Cambridge), EC law - Université Libre Bruxelles
CALL DATE: 1979 SILK: 1997

SUMMARY

Christopher Vajda is an extremely experienced litigator in EU/competition, Judicial Review, regulatory and tax law. He appears regularly in the specialist competition and tax Tribunals as well as the higher courts. Over the last three years he has appeared in 15 cases in the Court of Appeal, and in a large number of cases in the High Court, the European Courts and in the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT).  He has two pending cases before the Supreme Court. He has also acted in a number of sporting disputes before sporting appeal panels. He has also given expert evidence on EU law in US court proceedings as well as acting in telecom and utility regulatory disputes in the Middle East and Hong Kong. 

Christopher is listed in The Lawyer's Top 100 for 2012 where his EU and competition expertise is described as "top notch."

Recorder in the Crown Court
Bencher of Gray's Inn
Member of Northern Ireland Bar

 

RECENT/MAJOR CASES

Competition law

  • He acted for Ballast Nedam, a Dutch multinational construction company in its appeal to the CAT against its fine to the CAT [2011] CAT 3
  • He acted for Teva Pharmaceuticals in Chemistree v. Teva Pharmaceuticals (High Court, Chancery Division 4 July 2011) resisting an injunction under Article 102 TFEU)
  • He is acting in a number of follow-on competition damages actions for both claimants and defendants, including one that is now pending before the Supreme Court (BCL Old v BASF)
  • He acted for Siemens in the Court of Appeal and CAT in National Grid's appeal against a finding by Ofgem that National Grid abused its dominant position in relation to the supply of domestic-sized gas meters (2008-2010)
  • He acted for William Hill, Ladbrokes and BAGS in their claim that the sale of TV racing pictures to AMRAC breached Art 81EC (the Court of Appeal, 2009)
  • He acted in Devenish v Sanofi-Aventis(Court of Appeal, 2008) on the question of whether restitution was available in cartel cases
  • He acted for Welsh Water (Dwr Cymru) in Albion Water v OFWAT (Court of Appeal, (2008): margin squeeze
  • He acted for SFR, a French mobile phone company, in a state aid case before the European courts (2008-2009)
  • He acted for Nokia in its dispute with IPCom on whether IPCom licensing policy infringed Articles 81 and 82 EC (2008-2009) (Chancery Division, High Court)
  • Racecourse Association and others v OFT [2005] CAT 29 (first successful challenge to an OFT infringement decision)
  • He acted for a number of schools in the OFT investigation into the setting of private school fees (2005-2006)
  • He has given extensive state aid advice particularly in the context of the banking crisis, broadcasting and public private partnerships

Judicial review and regulatory

  • He has acted on a number of cases for Ofcom involving telecoms, TV and satellites before the CAT, Admin Court, Court of Appeal and the European Court
  • He has acted for major electricity and water utilities and also the Royal Mail before the CAT, Admin Court and Court of Appeal
  • He has acted for the Coal Authority (Admin Court and Court of Appeal)
  • He has acted for a number of telecoms companies both in the United Kingdom and the Far East
  • He acted for the European Low Fares Airline Association in a challenge to the Validity of EU Regulation on compensation for delayed flights (2004) EuLR 998
  • He has acted on numerous occasions for various Government Departments defending Judicial Reviews, e.g. Collins v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2006] EWCA Civ 376 (scope of citizenship provisions in the EU Treaty), Optident Ltd. v Secretary of State (2001) (HL) (Cosmetics Directive), R v SS for Health ex p Imperial Tobacco (2000) (Interim relief in respect of EU Directives) and the Factortame cases

EU law

  • Many of his competition, judicial review and tax cases involve EU law.
  • Wilson v. L'Ordre des Avocats du Barreau de Luxembourg (ECJ: compatibility of Luxembourg rules on establishment of lawyers with EU law)

Sport

  • He acted for a South African cricketer who was banned by the ECB from playing county cricket because he had played for the ICL in India. He was successful in an Appeal against the ECB. The Appeal Panel found that the ban was unlawful (2008) 

Tax

  • He has been involved in many of the landmark cases over the last 10 years including Halifax and BUPA (2006) ECJ (VAT avoidance); Isle of Wight (2009) ECJ (fiscal neutrality); Rank (current, fiscal neutrality); Pringles (Court of Appeal, 2009); LMUK (2007-2010), Loyalty schemes; and Debenhams (2005) (tax avoidance).

 

COMPETITION/EU LAW

Christopher Vajda QC has represented a large variety of clients, ranging from large multinational corporations to individuals, in major competition and EU cases. He has acted in a large number of cases in the European Court of Justice, Court of First Instance (now the General Court) and in all UK courts, including the CAT. Clients that he has acted for in court proceedings include Apple, Ballast Nedam, the BBC, the Bookmakers' Afternoon Greyhound Services, the Coal Authority, the European Low Fares Airline Association, Ford, ICI, Ladbroke, Land Rover, the London Metal Exchange, MAN ERF, Nokia, Ofcom, the Racecourse Association, Scottish Power, Sea Containers, SFR, Siemens, Smith & Nephew, Sumitomo Corporation, Teva Pharmaceuticals, Welsh Water, and William Hill.  He is currently acting in a number of large multinational private competition actions, including air cargo, copper tubes, the LCD and CRT cases, methionine, and paraffin wax. He has been a contributor to Bellamy & Child, European Community Law of Competition for over 20 years. He has also given expert evidence on EU law in US court proceedings.

In his EU practice, other than competition and state aid, he has advised and litigated on a wide variety of subjects including:

  • agriculture
  • anti-dumping and customs
  • broadcasting and telecommunications
  • common commercial policy
  • compatibility of national time limits with EU law
  • environment
  • energy
  • fishing
  • free movement of persons and services
  • freedom of establishment
  • pharmaceuticals and cosmetics
  • professional services
  • social security
  • taxation

Major cases

  • Oracle v Mtech (Court of Appeal, 2010 - on appeal to the Supreme Court). A trademark infringement case which raises fundamental issues on the inter-relationship between the Trademark Directive and general EU law principles
  • William Hill, Ladbrokes v. AMRAC (Art 81), Court of Appeal (2009)
  • National Grid v. Ofgem (Art 82), CAT (2009), acting for Siemens and CML
  • Albion Water v. Ofwat (2007-2009), (Art 82) CATand Court of Appeal
  • Bouygues v Commission (acting for Société Française de Radiotéléphonie) in a state aid challenge to the grant of 3G licences in France by Bouygues Telecom (2005-2009, CFI and ECJ)
  • Wootton Trucks v MAN ERF (2006) EWCA Civ 1042 (acted for MAN ERF in the Court of Appeal in defeating a challenge to termination of a dealer pursuant to motor vehicle block exemption)
  • Acted for Genzyme in follow-on damages case brought in the CAT by Healthcare@Home
  • Acted for various schools in relation to the OFT's investigation into exchange of price information which resulted in a settlement proposalin March 2006
  • RCA v OFT - CAT: acted for the Racecourse Association in the first case where the CAT overturned an OFT infringement decision (collective selling of media rights)
  • Scandlines v EC Commission - CFI: major case on excessive pricing under Article 82 EC (case settled after application to CFI lodged)
  • R (ELFAA) v DFT - Judicial review: challenge on behalf of low fare airlines, including Ryanair, to EC Regulation giving passengers compensation for delayed boarding and cancelled flights
  • Sumitomo v EC Commission - CFI and ECJ: an appeal against an alleged cartel infringement under Article 81 EC
  • Wilson v L'Ordre des Avocats du Barreau de Luxembourg - Administrative Court of Appeal in Luxembourg and ECJ: important case on the freedom of establishment of lawyers in which Christopher obtained an Article 234 reference from the Luxembourg Court to the ECJ
  • Brighton Pier - CFI: a challenge to a Commission decision clearing the grant of lottery funding to the Brighton West Pier as not involving aid (case settled)
  • Ford - ECJ: selective distribution system
  • Factortame - ECJ and UK courts: interim relief, damages, fishing
  • Ladbroke Racing v Commission - CFI and ECJ: state aid
  • Fiskeby v Commission -CFI: appeal against Commission decision on Art. 81 EC - Cartonboard
  • Claritas v Post Office - High Court: interim injunction under the Competition Act
  • MTV v BMG Records and others - High Court: collective licensing between record majors and MTV, Arts 81 and 82
  • George Michael v Sony - Court of Appeal: settled, recording contract and Art. 81
  • U2 v PRS - High Court: settled, performing royalties and Arts. 81 and 82
  • R. v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry ex p. Isle of Wight Council - Admin Court: state aid
  • R. v Secretary of State for Health ex p. Imperial Tobacco - HL: interim relief against implementation of EU Directive
  • Naraine v Hoverspeed - Admin Court: border controls and EU law
  • Optident v Department of Health and DTI - Court of Appeal and HL: classification of product as a cosmetic or medical device
  • QRS v Frandsen - Court of Appeal : Brussels Convention
  • R. v MAFF ex parte British Agrochemicals Association - Admin Court: marketing authorisation for plant protection products
  • ICI v Colmer - HL and ECJ: rights of establishment and corporation tax
  • Safir - ECJ: direct taxation and freedom to provide services 

 

PUBLIC & ADMINISTRATIVE LAW

Christopher's expertise in competition and EU law interacts with administrative and public law, especially regulatory issues and judicial review. He regularly acts for Claimants as well as Respondents in the Administrative Court, before regulators and foreign jurisdictions.

Judicial review cases in the Administrative Court:

  • R(Government of Bermuda) v Ofcom: judicial review concerning allocation of satellite spectrum (2008)
  • R (Abbey Mine) v Coal Authority: fairness in competitive tendering
  • R (TNT) v HMRC: VAT charges on postal services (2009)
  • R (ELFAA) v DFT: challenge on behalf of low fare airlines, including Ryanair, to EC Regulation giving passengers compensation for delayed and cancelled flights (2009)
  • Acting for Scottish Power on challenge to GB electricity transmission charges (2005)
  • Barclay Chemical: first UK case on new EU authorisation regime for pesticides
  • Inquam: challenge to telecom licence
  • Vodafone: legitimate expectation in the field of tax
  • R. (RM) v DCMS: acted for BBC in state aid challenge
  • R. (Dockeray) v DEFRA: human rights
  • R. v Secretary of State for Health ex p. Imperial Tobacco - Court of Appeal and HL: interim relief against implementation of an EU Directive
  • R v British Coal and President of Board of Trade ex parte Vardy: acted on behalf of a trade union challenging decision to close coal mines

 

VAT & CUSTOMS AND DIRECT TAX

Christopher's impressive expertise and experience in VAT places him in the top rank of VAT silks.

He acts both for the Commissioners and the private sector and is a member of the Revenue Bar Association.

Reported VAT cases include:

  • TNT - ECJ: VAT on postal supplies (2009)
  • Isle of Wight - ECJ: VAT and fiscal neutrality (2008)
  • Rank - High Court: VAT and fiscal neutrality (2009)
  • Debenhams - VAT Tribunal to Court of Appeall: merchant charge acquirer scheme
  • Halifax and BUPA - ECJ: tax avoidance cases and principle of abuse of right in EC law
  • Telewest - High Court/ CA: single/multiple supplies
  • Tesco - CA: treatment of vouchers (2003)
  • Kingfisher - VAT Tribunal: tax avoidance and gift vouchers
  • Courts - VAT Tribunal: tax avoidance and insurance on furniture
  • RAL - ECJ: place of supply
  • National Westminster Bank - High Court: repayment claim
  • Primback - ECJ: interest free credit

Christopher has also acted in a number of direct tax and customs cases. For example he acted for ICI in the ECJ on a challenge to the UK provisions on group relief and has acted for Japanese exporters in anti-dumping cases. 

 

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

  • Member of the editorial board of the United Kingdom Competition Law Reports
  • Co-author of the chapter on Judicial Review in a Competition Context in "Competition Litigation in the UK" (2005)
  • Author of State Aids chapter in Bellamy & Child "European Community Law of Competition" (6th Ed.) (2008)
  • Treasurer of United Kingdom Association For European Law
  • Has acted as abitrator in regulatory and competition disputes